Rudy Christian

Can We Talk?

A recent thread on the LinkedIn group discussion “Means, Methods & Materials for Restoration of the Built Environment” asked the question: “JOC, IPD, BIM and life-cycle costing/management are all critical…
By Rudy Christian
JUN 28, 2010
A recent thread on the LinkedIn group discussion “Means, Methods & Materials for Restoration of the Built Environment” asked the question: “JOC, IPD, BIM and life-cycle costing/management are all critical…

A recent thread on the LinkedIn group discussion "Means, Methods & Materials for Restoration of the Built Environment" asked the question: “JOC, IPD, BIM and life-cycle costing/management are all critical to restoration and sustainability of the built environment. Do you agree?”

In all honesty, I had to Google the acronyms to even have some context to work with when reading the comments. They sure weren’t tools I could find in my toolbox. The comments brought up some very interesting (to me) topics about the place of technology and the place of trades in historic preservation (HP). While replying. I realized this was something we need to talk about.

Communication is much easier when people understand the subject matter, not necessarily the language. When I was in Poland a few years back, one of my most enlightening experiences was interpreting a PowerPoint presentation being shown by Petre, who spoke eloquent Czechoslovakian and very little English.

He was showing pictures of his research concerned with an interpretation of ax marks found on historic timbers based on the marks left behind by the nicks in the ax, kind of a “broadax ballistics” approach. I spoke no Czech at all but had held and used the same tools as Petre had during his research, so the stuff of his presentation said the same thing to me it did to him, which I was able to interpret to my English comrades.

When we lived in a world where things were made by hand (not so long ago), understanding the stuff around us was much more natural. We lived with and worked with and maybe even were the traditional tradespeople who made the stuff. We understood the subject matter and could communicate about it in familiar ways.

The consequences of technological fabrication

Whether for better or for worse, which probably doesn’t even matter, that world has changed, and pretty much all of the stuff around us is made using technology. Understanding the subject matter is not only less natural, it has less apparent value. Hence we see technology developing forms of communication that are foreign too many traditional tradespeople, who are arguably an irreplaceable part of HP.

Is this a problem? Is this something we need to fix? To answer in the form of a famous recent American president, “That depends on what you mean by ‘this.’” One of things that becomes ever clearer to me is that communication itself is something we have, like so many other things, gotten worse instead of better at. Remember when the phone company used to know how to 'fish' wires through walls instead of stapling them to historic trim and siding?

From my perspective, the real issue is one of whether or not we feel the need to communicate. As the "trades" of building the future have evolved, the relative value of the knowledge held by tradesmen who knew how to do things the “old way” (by hand) has diminished. The academic environment has created a world in which entire occupations and specialties exist that weren’t even imagined when many of the greatest architectural works we now consider “wonders” were created. The real wonder is why we can’t see the value of so much of the knowledge that was held by those who came before us and built the objects we are trying to conserve.

One reason I get up every morning and pick up whatever tools I need to do my work is that I think our world community has the potential to learn to talk about and to learn to value all knowledge. Prejudice comes in many forms, but we need to all be very aware that it is all too often the reason we don’t learn from the experience of those around us and those who came before us--that and our habit of over focusing on how technology can make our lives better.

Rudy R. Christian is a founding member and past president of the Timber Framers Guild and of Friends of Ohio Barns and a founding member and executive director of the Preservation Trades Network. He is also a founding member of the Traditional Timberframe Research and Advisory Group and the International Trades Education Initiative. He speaks frequently about historic conservation and also conducts educational workshops. Rudy has also published various articles, including “Conservation of Historic Building Trades: A Timber Framer’s View” in the “APT Bulletin,” Vol. XXXIII, No. 1, and his recent collaborative work with author Allen Noble, entitled “The Barn: A Symbol of Ohio,” has been published on the Internet. In November 2000, the Preservation Trades Network awarded Rudy the Askins Achievement Award for excellence in the field of historic preservation.

As president of Christian & Son, his professional work has included numerous reconstruction projects, such as the historic “Big Barn” at Malabar Farm State Park near Mansfield, OH, and relocation of the 19th-century Crawford Horse Barn in Newark, OH. These projects featured “hand raisings,” which were open to the public and attracted a total of 130,000 interested spectators. He also led a crew of timber framers at the Smithsonian Folk Life Festival, Masters of the Building Arts program, in the re-creation and raising of an 18th-century carriage house frame on the Mall in Washington, DC. Roy Underhill’s “Woodright’s Shop” filmed the event for PBS, and Roy participated in the raising.

Christian & Son’s recent work includes working with a team of specialists to relocate Thomas Edison’s #11 laboratory building from the Henry Ford Museum to West Orange, NJ, where it originally was built. During the summer of 2006, Rudy; his son, Carson; and his wife, Laura, were the lead instructors and conservation specialists for the Field School at Mt. Lebanon Shaker Village, where the 1838 timber frame grainery was restored. In July and August 2008, Rudy and Laura directed and instructed a field school in the Holy Cross historic district in New Orleans in collaboration with the University of Florida and the World Monuments Fund.

Rudy studied structural engineering at both the General Motors Institute in Flint, MI, and Akron University in Ohio. He has also studied historic compound roof layout and computer modeling at the Gewerbe Akademie in Rotweil, Germany. He is an adjunct professor at Palomar College in San Marcos, CA, and an approved workshop instructor for the Timber Framers Guild.