Features

Book Review: Making Dystopia

A review of James Stevens Curl’s Making Dystopia by Nikos A. Salingaros.
By Nikos A. Salingaros
DEC 11, 2018
A review of James Stevens Curl’s Making Dystopia by Nikos A. Salingaros.

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases made through affiliate links.

Introduction by Timothy Brittain-Catlin
Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2018

592 pages; 72 b&w illustrations;
39 figures; $60
ISBN: 9780198753698

Can a text on architectural history, however thoroughly researched and brilliantly written, trigger an architectural revolution? For a discipline in ferment, this might just provide the jolt to set off an avalanche.

Making Dystopia demolishes the legitimacy through which a peculiarly inhuman aesthetic has dominated architectural culture during one century. That includes the latest designs by our Starchitects.

This book presents a comprehensive history of the Bauhaus, of Le Corbusier, the Soviet Constructivists, etc. Those defined the “look” that architecture has conformed to ever since, within an extremely limited palette of variations. Professor Curl lays out how anti-establishment movements at the start of the 20th century generated forces clamoring for a “new” architecture. He traces the unlikely success of anti-traditional design aesthetics as they coagulated into the International Style. Much of this history as presented in “standard” texts has been falsified.

The East Wing of the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto, Ontario, Canada (1933), was designed by the distinguished Canadian architectural firm of Chapman & Oxley, in a late Byzantino-Romanesque Revival style. It is seemingly being gobbled up by the Deconstructivist ‘Michael Lee-Chin Crystal’ extension (2002–07), designed by Studio Daniel Libeskind, in collaboration with Canadian architects Bregman & Hamann (later B+H Architects). This expensive Deconstructivist addition was not entirely free from problems associated with the weather (from a drawing of 2016 ©JSC).

Claims for styles evolving from premodernist architects turn out to be invented. Professor Curl debunks the commonly-cited “good intentions” of modernist pioneers: The reality is a freakish mixture of cult beliefs and ruthless egos. Most disturbing is the complete disdain for human biology. The modernists offer the building industry a cheap way of constructing massive high-density buildings for maximal profit. Grateful real-estate speculators and powerful car manufacturers exclusively promoted this architectural style in the media.

Today’s dominant architectural idiom descends directly from those early disruptive ideas, while traditional buildings remain on the banned list. Society accepts this absolutist situation as inevitable.

This iconoclastic landmark book might change the way we build from now on. It’s an outstanding work of scholarship that needs to be read by every architect and architecture student who still possesses a conscience.